Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 CCPA 264 - United States v. Sutherland International Despatch

United States v. Sutherland International Despatch’s Empirical Analysis

1933

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
April 1972
most recently cited

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently April 1972

7019331940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * Exhibit 1 shows the articles to be something more than brass channels. The brass channels forming a part of said article has been subjected to a manufacturing process. The testimony shows that the articles have been dedicated to a single use, and have no other use than in rectangular windows of marine craft, a use disclosed by the record to be different from the use to which brass channels without a further manufacturing process are put.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In the case at bar, * * * it may be said that although the major part of the article here involved, in its first estate, was a brass channel, it nevertheless became something more than that when it was subsequently lined with felt. * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “We further think that this case is controlled in principle by our decision in the case of United States v. Strauss & Buegeleisen, 20 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 378, T. D. 46184, and cases therein cited.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.