Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

21 C.M.A. 76

United States v. Nix

United States Court of Military Appeals · decided 1971-10-22

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently October 1998

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1971-10-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Opinion of the Court

Darden, Chief Judge:

¶2If an accused indicates after a court is called to order that he desires a military judge alone to try him, the court-martial must be recessed and the request executed in writing. United States v Dean, 20 USCMA 212, 43 CMR 52 (1970).

¶3In this case, however, the written request followed the testimony of one witness. This procedure does not comply with the holding in Dean, supra, since acceptance of the written request is a jurisdictional prerequisite. Under Deanwe do not test for prejudice.

¶4Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Military Review is reversed and the findings and sentence are set aside. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army. Another trial may be ordered.

Senior Judge Ferguson concurs.
Quinn, Judge

¶5(dissenting) :

¶6I would affirm the decision of the Court of Military Review. See my dissent in United States v Dean, 20 USCMA 212, 43 CMR 52 (1970).

/21/cma/76 · .json · Public domain