Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 CONN 213 - Whitney v. Bartholomew

Whitney v. Bartholomew’s Empirical Analysis

1851

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
11
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently May 2019

13 state decisions — followed in 11 states

4018511860187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Meeker v. Van Rensselaer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he trade and occupation of carriage-making, or of a blacksmith, is a lawful and useful one; and a shop or building, erected for its exercise, is not a nuisance per se”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Some things are unlawful or nuisances per se; others become so, only in respect to the time, place or manner of their performance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.