Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 Conn. App. 496 - State v. Torma

21 Conn. App. 496 - State v. Torma’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently December 2017

16 state decisions

120199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Sharpe · Hartford Division, Emhart Industries, Inc. v. Amalgamated Local Union 376 · State v. Harrell · State v. Pettersen · State v. LaSelva

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “suspension by the commissioner, requires proof of compliance with General Statutes § 14-111 (a). "[ Section] 14-111 (a) does not require personal service of a notice of suspension but provides that a notice forwarded by bulk certified mail to the address of the person registered as owner or operator of any motor vehicle as shown by the records of the commissioner shall be sufficient notice to such person .... The statute does not require that a defendant actually receive notice, or that a motor vehicle department receive a return receipt. Constructive notice by the motor vehicle department is all that is required.... The requirements of § 14-111 (a) were satisfied by a showing of competent evidence that notice of the suspension was mailed to the defendant at his last known address as indicated by the records of the commissioner.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Regardless of the defendant's ignorance of the law, he remained obligated under General Statutes § 14-45 to notify the commissioner of his change of address.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.