Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 CONNAPP 557 - State v. Raucci

State v. Raucci’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

72
cited by 72 later decisions
4
states following
May 2021
most recently cited

72 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently May 2021 · most notably Cobham v. Commissioner of Correction (2001), State v. Cator (2001)

72 state decisions

2701990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Carnegie v. United States · Scharffe v. Perkins · McNamara v. County of San Diego Department of Social Services · Oneida Motor Freight, Inc. v. United Jersey · Marino v. Ortiz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “has voluntarily called into play the validity of the entire sentencing package, and, thus, the proper remedy is to vacate it in its entirety. More significantly, the original sentencing court is viewed as having imposed individual sentences merely as component parts or building blocks of a larger total punishment for the aggregate convictions, and, thus, to invalidate any part of that package without allowing the court thereafter to review and revise the remaining valid convictions would frustrate the court's sentencing intent.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “is limited by its original sentencing intent as expressed by the original total effective sentence ....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “restructure the entire sentencing plan in order to effectuate its original sentencing intent”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.