Krawski v. Planning & Zoning Commission’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

70 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “. . . nothing in this section shall be deemed to authorize the Commission to approve any such subdivision or resubdivision which conflicts with applicable zoning regulations.”

   4 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Kordiak v. Town of Woodbridge, No. Cv 92-0336745 (Jul. 21, 1993) · Friends of Eccleston v. Town of Groton, No. 09 74 71 (May 4, 1992)

2. “A commission may, at its discretion, choose between disapproval or approval with conditions.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Nolan v. Durham Planning Zoning Comm., No. Cv97-83345 (Mar. 16, 1999) · C.C.S. v. Planning Comm. of Norwalk, No. Cv96 0153517 S (Oct. 17, 1997)

3. “shall approve, modify and approve, or disapprove”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Cordone v. City, West Haven P. Z. Com., No. Cv 00-0439675s (Jun. 19, 2001) · 2001 Conn. Super. Ct. 8106 - Iaccarino v. City, West Haven P. Z., No. Cv 00-0440204s (Jun. 18, 2001)