¶1We have examined the defendant’s claims and conclude that they are without merit. See State v. Smith, 18 Conn. App. 368, 370 n.1, 558 A.2d 257 (1989).
¶2There is no error.
21 Conn. App. 817
Decided April 18, 1990
Connecticut Appellate Court · decided 1990-04-18
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1990
Relies on State v. Smith
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1990-04-18
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1We have examined the defendant’s claims and conclude that they are without merit. See State v. Smith, 18 Conn. App. 368, 370 n.1, 558 A.2d 257 (1989).
¶2There is no error.