21 Conn. Super. Ct. 371 - Kantrowitz v. Clipfel’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “substantial rights of the defendants were acquired by reason of the action, including but not limited to their right, under the circumstances revealed by the files to this court, to a speedy trial of the issues already framed and to the recovery of their costs.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 1996 Conn. Super. Ct. 8534 - Hughes v. Carmody Torrance, No. 128305 (Oct. 15, 1996) · 2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 9937 - Byrd v. Leszcynski, No. Cv96-0564251-S (Aug. 25, 2000)

2. “a serious question of abuse of the privilege granted to a litigant under our law.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 2000 Conn. Super. Ct. 9937 - Byrd v. Leszcynski, No. Cv96-0564251-S (Aug. 25, 2000)