Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 F.1d 689 - McAlpine v. Hedges

McAlpine v. Hedges’s Empirical Analysis

21 F. 689 · 1884

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
June 1914
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Meader v. Norton · Musselman v. Kent · Sparks v. State Bank · Boyd v. Boyd · Wiseman v. Hutchinson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When a fraud is of a secret nature, and ' in the particular ease has been conceived and executed upon such a plan as to secure continued secrecy, without further acts of'concealment except silence, the statute ought not' to run until there has been a discovery. In such a case it may well be said to have been a continuous concealment. The making of a fraudulent deed, and the keeping of it off the record by all the persons concerned in and cognizant" of ■the transaction, combined with their purposed silence upon the subject, it certainly will not do to say is not a concealment, for which relief may he granted.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.