Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 F.2d 732 - Downer v. Graham

Downer v. Graham’s Empirical Analysis

21 F.2d 732 · 1927

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
July 1944
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Hagar v. · Mills Iowa v. Burlington

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Disposition of any of said lands, or of any money or thing of value directly or indirectly derived therefrom, for any object other than for which such particular lands, or the lands from which such money or thing of value shall have been derived, were granted or confirmed, or in any manner contrary to the provisions of this Act, shall be deemed a breach of trust. * * * “A separate fund shall be established for each of the several objects for which the said grants are hereby made or confirmed, and whenever any moneys shall be in any manner derived from any of said land the same shall be deposited by the state treasurer in the fund corresponding to the grant under which the particular land producing such moneys was by this Act conveyed or confirmed. No moneys shall ever be taken from one fund, for deposit in any other, or for any object other than that for which the land producing the same was granted or confirmed. The state treasurer shall keep all such moneys invested in safe, interest-bearing securities, which securities shall be approved by the governor and secretary of state of said proposed State, and shall at all times be under a good and sufficient bond or bonds con ditioned for the faithful performance of his duties in regard thereto, as defined by this Act and the law's of the State not in conflict herewith. * * * “It shall be the duty of the Attorney-General of the United States to prosecute, in the name of the United States and in its courts, such proceedings at la”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.