Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

21 F.2d 787

Whitehurst v. Grimes

Kentucky Eastern District Court

Decided September 17, 1927.

Kentucky Eastern District Court · decided 1927-09-17

2 counsel of record

Applies 47 U.S.C. § 51

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1927-09-17

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently February 2000

1 district · 1 state decisions

10192719301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Commerce <§=^>63 — Municipal ordinance imposing license on radio broadcasters held invalid as regulation of interstate commerce.

¶2The business of radio broadcasting is interstate, though communication may be intended only for intrastate transmission, and, Congress having covered the field by appropriate legislation, a municipal ordinance imposing a license tax on all persons, firms, or corporations operating a radio broadcasting station, either commercial or amateur, is invalid as a regulation of interstate commerce.

¶3In Equity. Suit by R. B. Whitehurst against J. W. Grimes, Chief of Police of Wilmore, and Wilmore, Ky. On defendants’ motion to dismiss bill for want of equity.

¶4Motion denied.

¶5Paul M. Segal, of Denver, Colo., and James Park, of Lexington, Ky., for plaintiff.

¶6R. L. Bronaugh, of Nicholasville, Ky., for defendants.

¶7ANDREW M. J. COCHRAN, District Judge.

¶8This suit is before me on defendants’ motion to dismiss the bill for want of equity and that it does not state facts sufficient to entitle plaintiff to the relief which he seeks.

¶9The plaintiff is an amateur radio operator. He lives and operates an amateur radio station located in the city of Wilmore, a municipality of this state located in this district. This he has done since October, 1924. He has a license so to do from the United States. It was granted October 19,1925, for two years by tbo Secretary of Commerce, under the Act of August 13, .1912 (47 USCA §§ 51 — 60; Comp. St. §§ 10100-10109), and was extended Mareh 15, 1927, by the Federal Radio Commission, appointed under the Aet of February 23,1927 (47 USCA^ §§ 81-120), by General Order No. 1, until further orders therefrom. The designation of his station is 9 ALM.

¶10On October 1, 1926, the defendant by its board of council passed an ordinance requiring all persons, firms, and corporation's operating a radio broadcasting station, either commercial or amateur, to pay a license tax therefor and providing a penalty for failure to do so. The tax provided-is not oil the property of tile radio operator, but on the business of radio broádeasting. Radio communications are all interstate. This- is so, though they may be intended only for intrastate transmission; and interstate transmission of such communications may be seriously affected by communications intended only for intrastate transmission. Such communications admit of and require a uniform system of regulation and control throughout the United States, and Congress has covered the field by appropriate legislation. It follows that the ordinance is void, as a regulation of interstate commerce.

¶11The motion to dismiss is overruled.

/21/f2d/787 · .json · Public domain