Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 F.2d 88 - In re Grant

In re Grant’s Empirical Analysis

21 F.2d 88 · 1927

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
September 1993
most recently cited

1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 110

Relies on Daniel Holden v. J a Stratton · Cohen v. Samuels · Cohn v. Malone · Frederick v. Fidelity Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Philadelphia · Hilliard v. Wisconsin Life Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The fact that this privilege or power is deemed personal to the insured is stressed somewhat by counsel for the bankrupt as bearing upon his claim that the right does not pass to the trustee. But this is not thought sound in view of the provisions of subdivision 3 of section 70(a) of the bankruptcy law. Grant, 21 F.2d at 90 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.