Brown v. Wa Perrill US’s Empirical Analysis
21 F.3d 1008 · 1994
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently September 2014
3 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3585
Relies on Meade v. Grubbs · Crawford v. Jackson · United States v. Haney · Bruss v. Harris · Roche v. Sizer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although the opinion in Hernandez is silent on this point, it appears that Hernandez was “on loan” under the writ for only the time necessary to sentence him. This short duration is typical of all the cases cited by Appellees and numerous other cases reviewed by this court. However, in the case presented herein Appellant was in federal prison pursuant to a writ for over a year and a half before he was released by the federal court on bond, and he was not even tried for his federal crimes for an additional seven months. Thus he was in federal control for over two years. Absent evidence to the contrary, we are unwilling to infer that a federal detention and control pursuant to a writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum may last for such an extended period without the detention transmuting into custody.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The fact that the state continued to grant Appellant jail time credit does not impact on our analysis under the facts presented herein because Appellant clearly satisfied the requirements of S 3568.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he Attorney General shall give ... credit toward service of [a] sentence for any days spent in custody in connection with the offense or acts for which sentence was imposed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Tighe v. Jw Booker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.