United States v. King’s Empirical Analysis
21 F.3d 1302 · 1994
Citation profile
25 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently June 2013 · most notably United States v. Cooper (2006), United States v. Bethancourt (1995)
25 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 18 U.S.C. § 641 (Livestock Fraud Protection Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on United States v. St. Cyr · United States v. Bierley · United States v. Braslawsky · United States v. Vontsteen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“regularity and sophistication of a defendant's operation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.