Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 F.3d 133 - United States v. Glover

United States v. Glover’s Empirical Analysis

21 F.3d 133 · 1994

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
3
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

30 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently May 2017 · most notably United States v. Blackwell (2006), United States v. Price (1998)

30 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

270199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 26 U.S.C. § 5861 (§ 201 of the Gun Control Act of 1968)

Relies on Carnegie v. United States · Needler v. Valley National Bank of Arizona · Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor · Scharffe v. Perkins · United States v. Murdock

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “may analyze the evidence, comment upon it, and express his [or her] views with regard to the trial testimony of the witnesses.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[M]otions for a new trial based on newly-discovered evidence are disfavored and should be granted with caution.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “cannot be deemed `newly discovered evidence' within the meaning of Rule 33”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.