Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 F.3d 188 - Wikberg v. Reich

Wikberg v. Reich’s Empirical Analysis

21 F.3d 188 · 1994

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
November 2017
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently November 2017

11 federal appellate · 4 district ·

130199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 38 U.S.C. § 4212

Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Califano v. Sanders · Joshua Deshaney, a Minor, by His Guardian Ad Litem, and Melody Deshaney,s v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, et al. · Olim v. Wakinekona · Linda R. S. v. Richard D.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If any special disabled veteran or veter-. an of the Vietnam era believes any contractor of the United States has failed to comply or refuses to comply with the provisions of the contractor’s contract relating to the employment of veterans, the veteran may file a complaint, with the Secretary of Labor, who shall promptly investigate such complaint and take appropriate action in accordance with the terms of the contract and applicable laws and regulations.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “a citizen lacks standing to contest the policies of the prosecuting authority when he himself is neither prosecuted nor threatened with prosecution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.