United States v. Rimell’s Empirical Analysis
21 F.3d 281 · 1994
Citation profile
41 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably United States v. Darden (1995), United States v. Fregoso (1995)
41 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1005 · 18 U.S.C. § 1344 · 18 U.S.C. § 152
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Cronic · California v. ARC America Corp. · United States v. Lane · Lane v. Peterson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises.” 18 U.S.C. § 1341 . The wire fraud statute criminalizes the use of”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The bank fraud statute was modeled after the mail and wire fraud statutes, and this court has stated that the bank fraud statute should be given the same broad construction as those statutes.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“has uniformly found constitutional error without any showing of prejudice [only] when counsel was either totally absent, or prevented from assisting the accused during a critical stage of the proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Duval v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.