Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 F.3d 305 - Kramer v. Kemna

Kramer v. Kemna’s Empirical Analysis

21 F.3d 305 · 1994

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
April 2017
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently April 2017 · most notably Tiedeman v. Benson (1997), United States v. Dixon (1995)

16 federal appellate · 4 district ·

180199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Barefoot v. Estelle · Kenley v. Armontrout · Flieger v. Delo · Thompson v. United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Failure to give the district court a first opportunity to decid[e] the merits of an argument constitutes a waiver of that argument.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.