United States v. Hanno’s Empirical Analysis
21 F.3d 42 · 1994
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently November 2024 · most notably United States of America v. Marion Promise (2001), United States v. Castner (1995)
24 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 753
Relies on United States v. Olano · Faretta v. California · United States v. Cronic · Snyder v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · United States v. Jorn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“seriously affect the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings independent of the defendant's innocence.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“impacts on the fairness, integrity and public reputation of judicial proceedings”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“to be present during the impaneling of a jury....”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.