Public-domain · open source

21 F.3d 424

Docket No. 92-1481.

Tgl Corporation Gold v. Graff

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: Feb. 24, 1994. Decided: April 21, 1994.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1994-04-21

Relies on Oliver S. Travers, Jr. Mary J. Travers v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, Leonard O. Gerber Pauline K. Gerber v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, Mark A. Abeshouse v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, William H. Schaeffer Francis D. Schaeffer v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, Barry M. Pachino Judith Pachino v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, Apparel Associates v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, Donovan M. Hamm, Jr. Linda Hamm v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, Frances D. Schaefer v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, William H. Schaefer v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, Arthur T. Ward Dorothy M. Ward v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, Sidney Zulver Doris Zulver v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, Julius Zulver Selma Zulver v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, Dennis W. Townsend Susan A. Townsend v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, Townsend & Company, Incorporated & Subsidiary v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, Hanan Sibel Carole Sibel v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, Murray I. Resnick Ellen M. Resnick v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, William Z. Fox Myra L. Fox v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, David Fox Sheila F. Fox v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, Jack L. Baylin Gail B. Baylin v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, David B. Hoffberger Janet S. Hoffberger v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, James W. Shaw Barbara G. Shaw v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, David J. Quigley Mary Lou Quigley v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, David L. Seagren, Individually and as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Dorothy P. Seagren Estate of Dorothy P. Seagren v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, Albert E. Thompson, Jr. Nancy L. Thompson v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1994-04-21

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently October 2011 · most notably Advance Watch Company, Limited v. Kemper National Insurance Company, the Travelers Indemnity Company of America, Cross-Appellee (1996), 50 Cal. App. 4th 548 - Lebas Fashion Imports of USA, Inc. v. ITT Hartford Insurance Group (1996)

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria; James C. Cacheris, Chief District Judge; T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge; Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-91-2-M, CA-91-21-M, BK-88-1848-AB).

John Eliot Graff, James William Graff, appellants pro se.

H. Jason Gold, Gold & Stanley, P.C., Alexandria, VA; Michael Hugh Doherty, Arlington, VA, for appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

John Eliot Graff and James William Graff appeal from a number of district court orders in two consolidated actions instituted against them by the Trustee in bankruptcy for T.G.L. Corporation, in which the Trustee sought to recover two assets allegedly belonging to the bankruptcy estate. Our review of the record and the district court's opinions accompanying the orders referenced in the Graffs' notice of appeal reveals that this appeal is without merit. Therefore, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Burroughs v. Graff, Nos. CA-91-2-M; CA-91-21-M (E.D. Va. Sept. 6, 1991; Dec. 6, 1991; Dec. 11, 1991; Jan. 17, 1992; Apr. 1, 1992; Apr. 10, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.