Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

21 F.3d 426

Docket No. 93-7230.

United States v. Smith

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Feb. 17, 1994. Decided March 11, 1994.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1994-03-11

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on United States v. Harshefi

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1994-03-11

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Michael James Smith, appellant Pro Se.

Thomas Richard Ascik, Office of the United States Attorney, Asheville, NC, for appellee.

W.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Smith, No. CR-92-110, CA-93-247-2 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 26, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/21/f3d/426 · .json · Public domain