United States v. Arionus

Filed: April 21, 1994.

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1994-04-21

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently November 1994 · most notably Risdal v. Waldebach (1994), United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Superior Systems, Inc. v. Levy Wrecking Company, Inc., Continental Insurance Company (1994)

23 federal appellate ·

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1994-04-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.

Before FAGG, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Robert James Arionus appeals his drug-related conviction and his guidelines sentence. Arionus contends the evidence is insufficient to support the jury verdict. Arionus also contends the district court improperly used his past drug convictions for sentence enhancement. We have carefully considered Arionus's contentions and find them to be without merit. We thus affirm Arionus's conviction and sentence. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

¶2

A true copy.

Attest:

¶3

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.