Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 F.3d 541 - Baumgartner

Baumgartner’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
4
states following
January 2021
most recently cited

10 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently January 2021 · most notably 34 Cal. 4th 553 - Graham v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. (2005), Epps v. Fowler (2011)

10 district · 4 state decisions

2301990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Blum v. Stenson · Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp. · Farrar v. Hobby · Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School District

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[F]rom a policy standpoint, if defendants could deprive plaintiffs of attorney’s fees by unilaterally mooting the underlying case by conceding to plaintiffs’ demands, attorneys might be more hesitant about bringing these civil rights suits, a result inconsistent with Congress’ intent in enacting section 1988.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “comparable relief through a consent decree or settlement,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “It is settled law, of course, that relief need not be judicially decreed in order to justify a fee award under § 1988. A lawsuit sometimes produces voluntary action by the defendant that affords the plaintiff all or some of the relief he sought through a judgment — e.g., a monetary settlement or a change in conduct that redresses the plaintiffs grievances. When that occurs, the plaintiff is deemed to have prevailed despite the absence of a formal judgment in his favor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.