Miklavic v. USAir Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
21 F.3d 551 · 1994
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently June 2016 · most notably Oshiver v. Levin, Fishbein, Sedran & Berman (1994), Podobnik v. United States Postal Service (2005)
14 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 45 U.S.C. § 153 (Railway Labor Act) · 45 U.S.C. § 156 (Railway Labor Act) · 45 U.S.C. § 184 (Railway Labor Act)
Relies on Nolde Bros., Inc. v. Local No. 358, Bakery & Confectionery Workers Union · Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn. · National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Claiborne Hardware Co. · Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. · Hersh v. Allen Products Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The disputes between an employee or group of employees and a carrier or carriers growing out of grievances or out of the interpretation or application of agreements concerning rates of pay, rules, or working conditions ... may be referred by petition of the parties or by either party to the appropriate division of the Adjustment Board....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.