Koray v. Sizer’s Empirical Analysis
21 F.3d 558 · 1994
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 7 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2024 · most notably Reno v. Koray (1995), Dawson v. Scott (1995)
22 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (§ 1352 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 18 U.S.C. § 3141 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 18 U.S.C. § 3142 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 18 U.S.C. § 3146 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 18 U.S.C. § 3585 · 18 U.S.C. § 751 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of United States Inc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Consumer Alert · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca · Gregory Lumber Co. v. United States · Morrison v. Olson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“be given credit toward the service of a term of imprisonment for any time he has spent in official detention prior to the date the sentence commences.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Reno v. Koray · Dawson v. Scott“had to account for his presence five times a day, he was subject to random breath and urine tests, his access to visitors was limited in both time and manner, and there was a paucity of vocational, educational, and recreational services compared to a prison facility.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Reno v. Koray“internal agency guidelines” that the BOP may alter "at will” and, thus, they are "entitled to a lesser level of deference from the courts than are published regulations subject to the rigors of the Administrative Procedures Act, including public notice and comment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dawson v. Scott
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.