Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 F.3d 70 - United States v. Cruce

United States v. Cruce’s Empirical Analysis

21 F.3d 70 · 1994

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
3
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably United States v. Soape (1999), Kurzawa v. Jordan (1998)

19 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

230199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 18 U.S.C. § 1344 · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 215 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 657 · 28 U.S.C. § 994

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · North Carolina v. Pearce · Griffith v. Kentucky · Williams v. People of State of New York · Missouri v. Hunter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “misconceives the focal point of the double jeopardy protection against a second punishment as the conduct considered in setting the [Bennett I] sentence, instead of the conviction offense that prompted [that] sentence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The Double Jeopardy Clause protects against (1) a second prosecution after acquittal, (2) a second prosecution for the same offense after conviction, and (3) multiple punishments for the same offense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.