Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 F.3d 753 - United States v. Berman

United States v. Berman’s Empirical Analysis

21 F.3d 753 · 1994

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
May 2016
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently May 2016 · most notably United States v. Mohammad (1995), United States v. Zaragoza (1997)

17 federal appellate · 1 district ·

180199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3572 · 18 U.S.C. § 3663 · 18 U.S.C. § 641 (Livestock Fraud Protection Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 657 · 18 U.S.C. § 658 · 18 U.S.C. § 665

Relies on Morissette v. United States · United States v. Feola · United States v. Casamento · McCandless v. Furlaud · Richmond Mortgage Loan Corporation v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “when a district judge orders restitution while withholding a fine on the ground of the defendant's inability to pay, and fails to explain his action, the case must be remanded for an explanation.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “shall impose a fine ... only to the extent that such fine ... will not impair the ability of the defendant to make restitution.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the intent to embrace all security interests can reasonably be inferred when we recall that the statute dates from the 1930s, when the terms “mortgage” and “chattel mortgage,” which have since been superseded by “security interest,” UCC 9-102(2), were used interchangeably to refer to nonpossessory security interests in personal property, and when the verb “mortgage” (the statute uses the verb, not the noun) was commonly used to refer the granting of any such interest.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.