Beauchamp v. Sullivan’s Empirical Analysis
21 F.3d 789 · 1994
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently January 2018
9 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Bell v. Hood · Helling v. McKinney · Crowley Cutlery Company v. United States of America and Commissioner of Customs of the United States Customs Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if we affirmed the dismissal of the suit with prejudice on the ground of lack of standing, we would be barring [the plaintiff] on the basis of what may well be a pleading error rather than a fatal deficiency in the suit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hegge v. Thompson“prison officials may have a constitutional duty to protect inmates from high levels of ambient ciga rette smoke”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“he had to allege an injury to himself, and merely took for granted that the court would assume”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hegge v. Thompson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.