Padilla-Agustin v. Immigration & Naturalization Service’s Empirical Analysis
21 F.3d 970 · 1994
Citation profile
60 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 82 later decisions — most recently December 2011 · most notably Martinez-Serrano v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (1996), Cano-Merida v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (2002)
60 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 554 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 8 U.S.C. § 1105A (§ 106 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Doherty · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Abudu · Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. Craft
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the BIA's strict Notice of Appeal requirements, and the failure to give any advance warning before an appeal is dismissed [violates] the due process rights of an alien.”
13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to law.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a brief arguing for dismissal based on insufficient specificity, which would have put petitioner on notice of the potential for summary dismissal of his appeal.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.