Glenn v. Shalala’s Empirical Analysis
21 F.3d 983 · 1994
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 38 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably Kepler v. Chater (1995), Butera v. Apfel (1999)
19 federal appellate · 38 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · Arkansas Public Service Commission v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. · Casias v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Polaski v. Heckler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We examine the record as a whole, including whatever in the record fairly detracts from the weight of the Secretary's decision and, on that basis, determine if the substantiality of the evidence test has been met.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“considering the record as a whole, including whatever fairly detracts from the findings, there is sufficient evidence which a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a finding that the physical or mental impairment on the basis of which such benefits are provided has ceased, does not exist, or is not disabling [and must be] supported by— (1) substantial evidence which demonstrates that— (A) there has been any medical improvement in the individual’s impairment or combination of impairments (other than medical improvement which is not related to the individual’s ability to work), and (B) the individual is now able to engage in substantial gainful activity....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.