Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

21 F. App'x 145

Bidgood v. United States

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided October 23, 2001

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2001-10-23

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2002

Relies on United States v. Pridgen

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-10-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

*146 PER CURIAM.

¶1 Bradley Dean Bidgood seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying the government’s motion to reduce his sentence under Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b). We dismiss the appeal from the denial of the Rule 35(b) motion because the order is not reviewable. See United States v. Pridgen, 64 F.3d 147, 149-50 (4th Cir.1995).

¶2 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶3 DISMISSED.

/21/fappx/145 · .json · Public domain