Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

21 F. App'x 160

Taylor v. Ritz Camera Centers, Inc.

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided October 25, 2001

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2001-10-25

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently January 2015

1 district ·

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-10-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Steven J. Taylor appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Ritz Camera Centers in his action in which he asserted claims of employment discrimination. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Taylor v. Ritz Camera Ctrs, No. CA-99-3226 WMN (D. Md. filed Mar. 29, 2001; entered Mar. 30, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED.

/21/fappx/160 · .json · Public domain