Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

21 F. App'x 161

Worsham v. Brown

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided October 25, 2001

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2001-10-25

Cited by 2 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2002

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-10-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Waynard Worsham appeals from the district court’s order adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants in the employment discrimination action. See 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621-634 (West 2001); 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Worsham v. Brown, No. CA-00-768 (E.D.Va. May 3, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED.

/21/fappx/161 · .json · Public domain