Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

21 F. App'x 220

United States v. Owens

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided November 5, 2001

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2001-11-05

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2002

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3582 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-11-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Tarus Owens appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582 (West Supp.2001) and construed as a 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Owens, No. CR-97-150 (E.D.Va. Apr. 12, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 DISMISSED.

/21/fappx/220 · .json · Public domain