Chavez v. Alderman

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided November 15, 2001

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2001-11-15

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2002

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-11-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Roberto Chavez appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Chavez’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm on the reasoning of the *238 district court. See Chavez v. Alderman, No. CA-99-1550-AM (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 27, 2001; entered Apr. 2, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED.