In re Brown’s Empirical Analysis
1938
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently October 1994
3 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wright v. Vinton Branch of Mountain Trust Bank · Baxter v. Savings Bank of Utica · Hoyd v. Citizens Bank of Albany Co. · Dallas Joint Stock Land Bank v. Davis · 10 F. Supp. 672 - In Re Cosgrave
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he petition in this case was not filed for the purpose of a just liquidation by composition with creditors but to defeat the wife from a right of possession in and to the real estate which was to be awarded to her under the divorce proceedings. This violates the purpose and intent of the statute ... and, as said by the Supreme Court of the United States, under that situation, the proceedings will be halted at the outset.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“(3) the offer and its acceptance are in good faith, and have not been made or procured except as herein provided, or by any means, promises, or acts herein forbidden. [Section 12(d)(3)]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.