21 F. Supp. 2d 1088 - Hanley v. Stewart’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1914 · 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 28 U.S.C. § 1915A · 28 U.S.C. § 2403 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Anders v. California · Penson v. Ohio · Heck v. Humphrey · Neitzke v. Williams · City of Cleburne Texas v. Cleburne Living Center
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A prisoner whose case has been dismissed pursuant to section 1915A(b)(1) has had his case heard and decided by a court and therefore has not been denied access to the courts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.