Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 F. Supp. 2d 138 - St. Pierre v. Dyer

21 F. Supp. 2d 138 - St. Pierre v. Dyer’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
March 2000
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1601 (§ 102 of the Truth in Lending Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)

Relies on Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Allen v. Wright · Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights Organization · Whitmore v. Arkansas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “analogous to a statute of limitations. See id. at 143. Because that five-year period had commenced no later than March 1, 1988, when Connecticut Indemnity denied coverage, the court concluded that St.Pierre had had a valid timeliness defense against American Iron's 1996 action. The court rejected arguments by St.Pierre that the American Iron action was timely under either of two Quebec-law principles that may affect an action's timeliness, to wit, the doctrine of”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. St. Pierre v. Dyer
  2. “granted summary judgment to the defendants on the ground that because the proceeds of the insurance policy were payable to Kenworth rather than to St. Pierre, St. Pierre lacked standing to maintain the action”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. St. Pierre v. Dyer
  3. “[r]enunciation requires 'a new obligation or an unequivocal promise to pay the prescribed debt.' Catellier v. Belanger, 4D.L.R. 267, 271 (Sup. Ct. of Can. 1924).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. St. Pierre v. Dyer

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.