21 F. Supp. 2d 168 - Charles v. Artuz’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Harris v. Nelson · Bracy v. Gramley · 990 F. Supp. 267 - Green v. Artuz · Mandell v. Board of Elections · 777 F. Supp. 282 - Munoz v. Keane
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“actually advance [their] claims of error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Abdi v. Duke
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.