Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 FSUPP2D 208 - Shamah v. Schweiger

Shamah v. Schweiger’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
March 2013
most recently cited

1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 2013

1 district ·

30199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1961 · 9 U.S.C. § 1 (Federal Arbitration Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 10 (Federal Arbitration Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 11 (Federal Arbitration Act)

Relies on Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan · United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc. · Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp. · Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the [arbitrator's] misconduct must amount to a denial of fundamental fairness of the arbitration proceeding to warrant vacating the award.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[m]isconduct typically arises where there is proof of either bad faith or gross error on the part of the arbitrator.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.