Securities & Exchange Commission v. Norton’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77Q (§ 17 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78T (§ 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · Landgraf v. USI Film Products · Central Bank of Denver Na v. First Interstate Bank of Denver Na K · Brown v. Shalala · Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“solely to avoid an adverse ruling on this summary judgment motion”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“at this very late stage in the litigation”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.