Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 F. Supp. 2d 76 - DiVirgilio v. Apfel

21 F. Supp. 2d 76 - DiVirgilio v. Apfel’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
May 2016
most recently cited

6 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 2016

6 district ·

40199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 416 (§ 216 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · Thomas v. Arn · Bowen v. Yuckert · United States v. Valencia-Copete

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the ALJ did not consider the non-examining doctor's advisory opinion[] alone but in the context of other evidence, including the treating doctor's reports, . . . and [his] credibility assessment of the [claimant's] pain. Taken together, this evidence is substantial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a court must affirm the Commissioner's decision so long as it is supported by substantial evidence, even if the record could arguably justify a different result.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.