21 F. Supp. 3d 49 - Ey v. John McHugh’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1552 · 10 U.S.C. § 628 · 5 U.S.C. § 701 · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of United States Inc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Consumer Alert · Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc. · County of Los Angeles v. Davis · Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“courts are particularly unfit to review the substance of military personnel decisions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.