Condon v. Haley’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
June 2015
most recently cited
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2283 · 42 U.S.C. § 1988
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Warth v. Seldin · Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Elrod v. Burns · Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Virginia’s federalism-based interest in maintaining control over the definition of marriage within its borders, (2) the history and tradition of opposite-sex marriage, (3) protecting the institution of marriage, (4) encouraging responsible procreation, and (5) promoting the optimal childrearing environment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bradacs v. Haley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.