Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

21 Ga. App. 506

Hudson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 19, 1917

Court of Appeals of Georgia · decided 1917-12-19

<p>Certiorari; from Grady superior court — Judge Harrell. September 13, 1917.</p>

Relies on McElhannon v. State · Moore v. State · Culbreth v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1917-12-19

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 1948

4 state decisions

201917192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Broyles, P. J.

¶1Where a writ of certiorari to review errors alleged to have been committed in a criminal ease in a city court has been sanctioned, the solicitor-general of the circuit in which the city having such court is located must be given timely notice of the sanction of the writ and of the time and place of hearing. The burden is upon the petitioner to show that such notice has been given; and unless this burden is carried the certiorari should be dismissed. Moore v. State, 96 Ga. 309 (22 S. E. 960); McElhannon v. State, 112 Ga. 221 (37 S. E. *507402); Culbreth v. State, 115 Ga. 242 (41 S. E. 594); Johnson v. State, 2 Ga. App. 181 (58 S. E. 415). It follows from this ruling that no error was committed in dismissing the certiorari in the instant case.

Decided December 19, 1917. Certiorari; from Grady superior court — Judge Harrell. September 13, 1917. L. W. Rigsby, for plaintiff in error. R. C. Bell, solicitor-general, Ira Carlisle, solicitor, F. A. Hooper, contra.

¶2 Judgment affirmed.

Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur.
/21/gaapp/506 · .json · Public domain