¶11. Under the facts of the case the court did not err in ' admitting in evidence, over the objections of the defendant, testimony as complained of in the 1st and 2d grounds of the -amendment to the motion for a new trial.
¶22. The venue of the offense was sufficiently proved. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
¶3 Judgment affirmed.