Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 HAW 513 - Goo Yee v. Rosenberg

Goo Yee v. Rosenberg’s Empirical Analysis

1913

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2008
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently February 2008

4 state decisions

101913192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Thomas v. City of Richmond · Spring Company v. Knowlton · Tracy v. . Talmage · National Bank Loan Company of Watertown v. Moses Petrie · Bigby v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]hough both parties to the transaction are participes criminis, still if they are not in pari delicto, the one less guilty will not be denied the ordinary assistance of the courts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.