Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 21 ILL 220 - Hawk v. McCullough

Hawk v. McCullough’s Empirical Analysis

1859

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 1979
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently November 1979

4 state decisions

101859186018701880189019001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We take occasion to repeat here that an exception taken to overruling a demurrer is improper, for the point saves itself; it is a" part of the record by the demurrer, and needs no bill of exceptions to place it there.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.