Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

21 Ill. App. 3d 121

Beanland v. Sweitzer

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 23, 1974

Appellate Court of Illinois · decided 1974-07-23

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 1981

4 state decisions

Relies on 72 Ill. App. 2d 11 - Roberson v. Leak · 77 Ill. App. 2d 44 - Farnsworth v. Shops Building

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1974-07-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM:

¶1Judgment was entered on a jury verdict in favor of plaintiffs in the amount of $2537. Defendants have appealed seeking reversal and remandment for a new trial.

¶2Plaintiffs-appellees have moved to affirm the judgment, on the grounds that the defendants did not file a post-Mai motion, and therefore failed to preserve a basis for review by this court.

¶3We believe plaintiffs-appellees’ interpretation of section 68.1 of the Civil Practice Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 110, par. 68.1) is correct. Roberson v. Leak, 72 Ill.App.2d 11, 218 N.E.2d 819; Farnsworth v. Shops Budding, 77 Ill.App.2d 44, 222 N.E.2d 132.

¶4Judgment affirmed.

¶5Mr. JUSTICE CREBS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

/21/illapp3d/121 · .json · Public domain