21 Ill. App. 3d 396 - Green v. Green’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
50 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently April 2020 · most notably 103 Ill. 2d 536 - Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. Barth (1984), 108 Ill. App. 3d 808 - In Re Marriage of Dwan (1982)
50 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 52 Ill. App. 2d 262 - Gregory v. Gregory · 12 Ill. App. 3d 467 - Slavis v. Slavis · 90 Ill. App. 2d 348 - Martin v. Masini · 2 Ill. App. 3d 524 - Davidson Masonry v. JL Wroan & Sons, Inc. · 131 Ill. App. 2d 11 - Needler v. Needler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““If at the time of announcing final judgment the judge requires the submission of a form of written judgment to be signed by him, the clerk shall make a notation to that effect and the judgment becomes final only when the signed judgment is filed. If no such signed written judgment is to be filed, the judge or clerk shall forthwith make a notation of judgment and enter the judgment of record promptly, and the judgment is entered at the time it is entered of record.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““[I]n the interim between the announcement of a final judgment in which the judge requires the submission of a form of written judgment and the actual signing of the written judgment the proceedings are in a state of temporary abeyance * * (Green v. Green (1974), 21 Ill. App. 3d 396, 402 , 315 N.E.2d 324 .)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.